"Better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer"
William Blackstone
There is a lot of talk on the internets today about the acquittal of Casey Anthony on charges of first degree murder, aggravated manslaughter and of aggravated child abuse. People are, based upon what they have read in the papers, or worse, upon what they have heard on cable TV, crying out that once again a guilty criminal has gone free.
Allow me to express my opinion:
I have no idea.
I am not qualified to have an opinion on the guilt or innocence of this woman.
Neither are you unless you were in the court room for the entire trial.
Here's what I do know: The prosecution enters into a case with the deck stacked in its favor in any major case. They have almost unlimited manpower compared to the defendant who actually has to hire his lawyer and investigators, or worse yet, rely on an overworked Public Defender. The only thing the defendant has on his side is the tattered remnants of the Bill of Rights, most of which the Bush Supreme Court has put through the shredder...and he has the presumption of innocence.
You can't put someone in prison "just to be safe", although I know of a case where a juror later admitted to doing exactly that. I keep hearing people complain about the OJ acquittal, totally ignoring that it was proven that a detective planted evidence. The scary thing that ought to keep you awake at night is the lengths that the prosecution will go to once they have committed to prosecute. The McMartin family went through a living hell for SEVEN YEARS before they were acquitted in the absurd Satanic pre-school case. It should have been obvious long before that they were innocent, but it is all too often about winning and not about justice.
That the prosecution could not even get a conviction on the child abuse charge would seem to indicate that either the prosecution totally botched everything or that the jury was convinced of not just a reasonable doubt, but a good chance of innocence.
That should settle things...but it won't.
Be seeing you.
William Blackstone
There is a lot of talk on the internets today about the acquittal of Casey Anthony on charges of first degree murder, aggravated manslaughter and of aggravated child abuse. People are, based upon what they have read in the papers, or worse, upon what they have heard on cable TV, crying out that once again a guilty criminal has gone free.
Allow me to express my opinion:
I have no idea.
I am not qualified to have an opinion on the guilt or innocence of this woman.
Neither are you unless you were in the court room for the entire trial.
Here's what I do know: The prosecution enters into a case with the deck stacked in its favor in any major case. They have almost unlimited manpower compared to the defendant who actually has to hire his lawyer and investigators, or worse yet, rely on an overworked Public Defender. The only thing the defendant has on his side is the tattered remnants of the Bill of Rights, most of which the Bush Supreme Court has put through the shredder...and he has the presumption of innocence.
You can't put someone in prison "just to be safe", although I know of a case where a juror later admitted to doing exactly that. I keep hearing people complain about the OJ acquittal, totally ignoring that it was proven that a detective planted evidence. The scary thing that ought to keep you awake at night is the lengths that the prosecution will go to once they have committed to prosecute. The McMartin family went through a living hell for SEVEN YEARS before they were acquitted in the absurd Satanic pre-school case. It should have been obvious long before that they were innocent, but it is all too often about winning and not about justice.
That the prosecution could not even get a conviction on the child abuse charge would seem to indicate that either the prosecution totally botched everything or that the jury was convinced of not just a reasonable doubt, but a good chance of innocence.
That should settle things...but it won't.
Be seeing you.
Yep.
ReplyDelete